Fuel Economy Of Roof Rack Vs Luggage Box

He compared the gas mileage of his car at 54 7 mph 88 kph with 1 no roof racks 2 an empty roof rack and 3 a mountain bike on the roof rack.

Fuel economy of roof rack vs luggage box.

42 mpg roof rack with thule dynamic 800 aerodynamic cargo box. Honda cr v fuel consumption on motorway freeway box on the roof and full luggage fix and drive. Beyond that the two items tested with the least impact on gas mileage were the paddle board and thule luggage carrier both of which caused about a 19 percent decrease in fuel economy or 5 5. Fuel economy mpg review fill up costs.

The biggest upsides you will find from the roof cargo carriers is accessing the cargo and of course the cost difference for the amount of cargo you can carry. 40 mpg roof mounted thule xtender 739 ski carrier with skis. 4 8l 100km 2019 crv hybrid fuel test. Mileage went from 41 mpg at 65 mph to 40 mpg.

He found that compared to the baseline of no roof rack the empty rack reduced his mpg by 12 7 and the roof rack with a bicycle reduced it by a whooping 27 3. But that s where you ve found a dilemma. 5 9 l 100 km approx. 6 0 l 100 km approx.

Hitch racks or roof racks which one should you choose. The empty roof rack had a nearly 2 percent impact on fuel economy which translates to a little more than three quarters of a gallon of gas. For some people the. This results in lowered fuel economy and more drag on your vehicle.

39 mpg thus the cargo box on the roof increased fuel consumption by about 5 compared to the baseline. Adding a roof rack and subsequent cargo to the roof of your vehicle will affect it s overall aerodynamics. It holds up to 13 cubic feet and 150 lbs. Adding any rooftop carrier cargo box or ski rack doesn t come free.

5 6 l 100 km approx. Hitch racks by the time you get the whole family loaded up in your vehicle there s no room for all the luggage and gear. That s why you ve decided to invest in a cargo carrier.